Explain the Differences Between Pangloss’s Philosophy Essay

Panglosss philosophy of life is that all is for the crush in the best of all possible populaces. This optimistic philosophy actually is the key portion of Voltaires satire. Panglosss philosophy is against the ideas of the Enlightenment period. Pangloss believes that a powerful idol had created the world and that, therefore, the world must be perfect. When creatures of the world, see something as premature or evil, it is because they do not understand the ultimate good that willing come out of it.Voltaire satirically shows the reader that Pangloss is not a credible character. Voltaire illustrates this by showing us that he keeps his optimistic thought flush when he is imprisoned. Pangloss ignores any evidence that contradicts his initial opinion. He also uses staccato arguments to support his feelings. Panglosss philosophy tries to impose a passive status toward all that is wrong in the world. If the world is the best one possible, then there is no reason to make any effo rt to switch things.Martin is more(prenominal) believable than Pangloss, not because he is more sophisticated, but because he is smarter and more likely to draw conclusions with which we can identify. Martin had been robbed by his wife and crush by his son and deserted by his daughter and also lived pecuniary setbacks, and therefore hes a pessimist whereas Pangloss is an optimist. He uses his experiences to judge the world whereas Pangloss was merely using a theory. As a result, Martin is more insightful than Pangloss to foresee withalts that will happen.Even though Martins philosophy is more believable than Panglosss, hes still not good at predicting how some people will behave because his philosophy is coming from fundamental pessimism. Therefore it might not be wrong to say that Voltaire is stressful to prove that we need malleable thought in our lives based on real evidence. Both philosophers will ultimately fail because theres no room for exceptions in their beliefs. Can dide starts his journey with the influence of Panglosss belief of best of all possible worlds.Pangloss and Candide, suffer and witness a long variety of horrors and tragedies together. During these tragedies, Panglosss s philosophy proves to be useless and even destructive at the end, because it prevents them from making realistic judgments. For example while Jacques was drowning, Pangloss doesnt let Candide save him by saying that the bay of Lisbon had been form for this Anabaptist to drown in. Also when Candide was buried under the rubble of the Lisbon earthquake, he asked for oil and wine because he was dying, but Pangloss ignored him and still assay to reason with the causes of the earthquake.At the end Candide rejects his philosophy of optimism and as he and his consideration Cacambo travel and go through more horrors, Candide starts believing a discouraged view of life. When Candide meets Martin, they set sail together and Martin is just the opposite of Pangloss. He does n ot believe that everything is for the best in this world. Even though Candide tries to fight Martin by talking about free will but it does not solve the problem of presence of evil in the world.In general, Martins arguments seem more reasonable than Panglosss ideas. But, like Pangloss, Martin believes so securely in his own view of the world that he is not flexible and usually dismisses real evidence that contradicts his philosophy. When Candide cannot find Cunegonde, Martin shows the bad influence of his pessimism. instead of attempting to comfort his friend, Martin uses Candides distress to further confirm his own world-view. middling like Panglosss optimism, Martins pessimism also keeps him from taking initiative to correct the world.